Lecture
to ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association), Denver,
14-16/05/2004
An open label study of autologous
incubated macrophages in patients with acute complete spinal
injury
Nachshon Knoller1, M.D.;
Moshe Hadani1, M.D.; Valentin Fulga2,
M.D; Gabriel Zelig3, M.D.; Josef Attias4,
Ph.D.; Gustavo Auerbach2, D.M.D.; David Snyder2,
Ph.D.; Ronit Bakimer2, Ph.D.; Zvi H. Rappaport5,
M.D.; Eti Yoles2,6, Ph.D.; Michael Belkin7,
M.D.; Michal Schwartz6, Ph.D.
1Department of Neurosurgery, Chaim Sheba Medical
Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
2Proneuron Biotechnologies, Ness-Ziona, Israel
3Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, Chaim
Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
4Institute for Clinical Neurophysiology &
Audiology, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel,
Petach-Tikva, Israel
5Department of Neurosurgery, Rabin Medical Center,
Petah Tiqva, Israel.
6Department of Neurobiology, The Weizmann
Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
7The Goldschleger Eye Institute, Tel-Aviv
University and Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
OBJECTIVES:
This Phase I, open label non-randomized study was designed
to assess the safety and tolerability of autologous
incubated macrophages administered to patients with acute
complete spinal injury.
METHODS: The
treatment consisted of preincubating macrophages with
autologous dermis, then injecting them into the spinal cord
during laminectomy within 14 days post-injury. Patients
were evaluated preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months after
treatment. Neurological completeness was established
according to ASIA standards and all patients had a
conclusive and stable ASIA A classification at baseline.
Follow-up assessments included safety monitoring, ASIA
Impairment Scale, motor and sensory scores, FIM, bladder and
bowel function, sensory and motor evoked potentials and MRI.
Initially, eight patients were recruited and 12 months
follow-up was completed. Later, four additional patients
were treated and follow-up is ongoing.
RESULTS: Of
the first eight patients, three converted from ASIA A to C.
Of the patients who remained ASIA A, three showed varying
degrees of increase in sensory scores, as well as improved
signs of somatosensory evoked potentials, objective evidence
of restored nerve conduction. Of the later patients still
in follow-up, one has recently converted to ASIA B. There
were no adverse events attributed to the implantation of
autologous macrophages.
CONCLUSIONS:
Administration of autologous macrophages is well tolerated
with no evidence of therapy-related adverse events. The
neurological outcomes are considered significantly better
than expected outcomes for patients with similar injuries.
Further clinical development of autologous macrophages in
the treatment of patients with acute SCI is supported by
this study.